Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424097›Full record

Trial reportAging cell2025

Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Biomarkers That Contribute to Biological Age Rejuvenation in Response to Single-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.

Matias Fuentealba, Dobri Kiprov, Kevin Schneider, Wei-Chieh Mu, Prasanna Ashok Kumaar, Herbert Kasler, Jordan B Burton, Mark Watson, Heather Halaweh, Christina D King and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06534450 (A Comparative Randomized Placebo), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06534450 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Comparative Randomized Placebo (Sham Pheresis) Controlled Clinical Trial To Evaluate The Effects Of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) On Age Related Biomarkers And Epigenetics

TypeinterventionalSponsorDobri KiprovRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsAgingArmsSham, Therapeutic Plasma Exchange, IVIG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Research progress on blood therapy for anti-aging.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matias FuentealbaBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7353-4394
Dobri KiprovBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Kevin SchneiderBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Wei-Chieh MuBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Prasanna Ashok KumaarBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Herbert KaslerBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Jordan B BurtonBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Mark WatsonBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-4457
Heather HalawehBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Christina D KingBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Zehra Stara YükselGlobal Apheresis Inc., Mill Valley, California, USA.
Chelo Roska-PamaongGlobal Apheresis Inc., Mill Valley, California, USA.
Birgit SchillingBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
Eric VerdinBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.
David FurmanBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the safety and biological age (BA) effects of various therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) regimens in healthy adults over 50. Participants received bi-weekly TPE with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), monthly TPE, or placebo. Randomization was based on entry date, and treatments were blinded to maintain objectivity. Primary objectives were to assess long-term TPE safety and changes in biological clocks. Secondary goals included identifying optimal regimens. Exploratory analyses profiled baseline clinical features and longitudinal changes across the epigenome, proteome, metabolome, glycome, immune cytokines, iAge, and immune cell composition. We demonstrate in 42 individuals randomized to various treatment arms or placebo that long-term TPE was found to be safe, with only two adverse events requiring discontinuation and one related to IVIG. TPE significantly improved biological age markers, with 15 epigenetic clocks showing rejuvenation compared to placebo (FDR < 0.05). Biweekly TPE combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (TPE-IVIG) proved most effective, inducing coordinated cellular and molecular responses, reversing age-related immune decline, and modulating proteins linked to chronic inflammation. Integrative analysis identified baseline biomarkers predictive of positive outcomes, suggesting TPE-IVIG is particularly beneficial for individuals with poorer initial health status. This is the first multi-omics study to examine various TPE modalities to slow epigenetic biologic clocks, which demonstrate biological age rejuvenation and the molecular features associated with this rejuvenation. Trial Registration: Registered trial NCT06534450 on clinicaltrials.gov under the purview of the Diagnostic Investigational Review Board.

Indexed as

AgingBiomarkersPlasma ExchangeRejuvenationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiomicsSingle-Blind MethodBiomarkersaginganti‐aginghumaninflammation

Identifiers

PMID40424097
PMCPMC12341816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.