ArticleLasers in medical science2025
The effect of low-level laser therapy after rapid maxillary expansion: Micro-CT analysis.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of in Vivo Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound and Low-Level Laser Therapy on Premaxillary Suture During Rapid Maxillary Expansion.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Bone regeneration therapy using low level laser treatment in a rabbit model: pilot study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate quantitatively the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone healing performed after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in rats, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Ninety rats were used, randomly distributed into three groups: control (n = 10) (young and adult rats - intact suture), experimental I (n = 40) (young and adult rats with RME without LLLT), and experimental II (n = 40) (young and adult rats with RME + LLLT). Five rats from the groups were euthanized on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 of the experiment and evaluated by microCT analysis. The laser increased the bone formation volume at 7 and 14 days (young rats) and 14 days (adult rats) were statistically significant (p < 0.05), but at the end of the healing (21 days), no statistically significant difference was observed between the laser and no-laser groups (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that LLLT improves bone mineralization during the early healing phases after RME, accelerating the process of bone mineralization during the initial experimental phase, which may have clinical implications in reducing orthodontic treatment duration and improving bone stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40423898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.