Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423741›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2025

Bioequivalence and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Administered in Three Eight-Hourly Dose Versus a Single Daily Dose: A Randomized Two-Treatment, Two-Period, Cross-Over Comparative Study.

Ekta Sinha, Sagar Bhagat, Saiprasad Patil, Rahul Kodgule, Vinayak Modi, Hanmant Barkate

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ekta SinhaGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400099, India. Ekta.Sinha@glenmarkpharma.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7432-7557
Sagar BhagatGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400099, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-4944
Saiprasad PatilGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400099, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-3188
Rahul KodguleGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400099, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1701-2115
Vinayak ModiGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400709, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8161-4873
Hanmant BarkateGlenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400099, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-9194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAntihistamines are an essential treatment option for cough and upper respiratory symptoms. Bilastine is a 2nd-generation antihistamine which is approved as a 20 mg once daily dose. The objective of the current study is to compare the oral bioavailability of bilastine administered thrice daily as a triple combination syrup of test product bilastine + dextromethorphan hydrobromide + phenylephrine hydrochloride (3.3 mg + 10 mg + 5 mg)/5 mL and a reference product of single-dose administration of 2.5 mg/mL (bilastine 2.5 mg) in healthy, adult, male human subjects under fed condition.

methodsThis was an open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, cross-over comparative bioavailability study. Patients were administered 10 mL of three 8-hourly doses of the triple combination test product and once daily dose of the reference product (syrup containing bilastine 2.5 mg). A 7-day washout period was implemented between doses. Blood samples were collected to assess the oral bioavailability of the test and reference products. Each subject received both treatments, serving as their own control, eliminating the need for a separate control group. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at various intervals post-dose to determine plasma concentrations of bilastine using LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed for bioequivalence using SAS version 9.4.

resultsA total of 34 subjects out of 36 enrolled, successfully completed the study, and were analyzed. The geometric mean ratios of test versus reference product for the areas under the curve (AUC

conclusionOur study concluded that the test product, bilastine + dextromethorphan hydrobromide + phenylephrine hydrochloride syrup (3.3 mg + 10 mg + 5 mg)/5 mL, and the reference product, bilastine solution 2.5 mg/mL, are bioequivalent with respect to the extent of absorption and were well tolerated.

Indexed as

BenzimidazolesPiperidinesAdministration, OralAdultArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDextromethorphanDrug Administration ScheduleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenylephrineTandem Mass SpectrometryTherapeutic EquivalencyYoung AdultBenzimidazolesbilastineDextromethorphanPhenylephrinePiperidines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.