ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2025
Sex Bias in Systemic Sclerosis: from Clinical to Immunological Differences.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex-specific autosomal susceptibility loci in systemic sclerosis: a genome-wide association study.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- 'It helps me stay on track': patient experiences using a mobile app for self-management of systemic sclerosis with a focus on fatigue in women.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Unraveled role of TLR7-mediated interferon signaling activation in COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by microvasculopathy, extensive fibrosis, and autoantibodies. The disease affects mostly the female sex. In this review, we highlight sex bias in clinical manifestations in SSc, and the pathophysiological changes underlying this bias. Male sex is associated with the diffuse cutaneous form of the disease, digital ulcers, interstitial lung disease, and worse prognosis. These clinical differences can be attributed to sex hormones and sex chromosomes, as females differ from males in sex hormones (estrogens in females, androgens in males) and sex chromosomes (XX in females, XY in males). Estrogens in females generally have immunostimulatory and profibrotic effects, and androgens have immunosuppressive effects. The X-chromosome contains many immunity-related genes, but the double dose of X-linked genes in females is avoided by random inactivation of one X-chromosome (XCI). However, many X-linked immunity-related genes, including toll-like receptor (TLR)7, TLR8 and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), escape XCI resulting in a biallelic expression with pathophysiological implications. Also, autosomal genes are differentially expressed between sexes. Therefore, sex should be included in future studies on SSc to aid in forming predictive algorithms and helping therapeutic decisions in this difficult-to-treat disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.