Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423704›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Imaging of the umbilicus.

Fumiko Yagi, Hirotaka Akita, Yoshitake Yamada, Masahiro Jinzaki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fumiko YagiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. fumikoyagi@rad.med.keio.ac.jp.
Hirotaka AkitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitake YamadaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro JinzakiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The umbilicus is a scar of the umbilical cord containing various embryonic remnants that can lead to postnatal diseases. It is the collection point for blood and lymphatic flow and other structures. Hence, various diseases and conditions can occur. In this review, we aimed to categorize umbilical diseases based on the embryonic remnants, including urachal remnants, omphalomesenteric duct anomalies, and complications of the umbilical arteries and veins. The urachus, formed from the allantois, can result in anomalies such as patent urachus and urachal cysts, with infections being the most common complication. Radiologists must note that urachal carcinoma is a rare complication presenting with characteristic imaging findings. The omphalomesenteric duct can lead to Meckel's diverticulum, the most prevalent gastrointestinal anomaly. In addition, obliterated umbilical arteries and veins can cause various conditions, including hernias and abscesses. This review also summarizes the umbilical ring lesions, such as gastroschisis and omphalocele, and iatrogenic lesions associated with laparoscopic procedures and catheter placement. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are crucial for diagnosing and managing these conditions. Understanding the embryological basis and imaging features of umbilical diseases is vital for timely diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

UmbilicusHumansUrachusOmphalomesenteric ductRound ligament of the liverUmbilical arteryUmbilical veinUmbilicusUrachus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.