Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423701›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2025

Testing the Effectiveness of DNA Barcoding Markers and Species Delimitation Methods Within the Genus Coelastrella (Sphaeropleales, Chlorophyta), With a Description of Coelastrella polaris sp. nov. Isolated from Arctic Soils.

E Krivina, M Sinetova, A Starikov, O Anissimova, A Temraleeva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E KrivinaG.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russian Federation, 142290. pepelisa@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0849-5832
M SinetovaК.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127276.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-1762
A StarikovК.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127276.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0411-6350
O AnissimovaFaculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-3675
A TemraleevaG.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russian Federation, 142290.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3445-0507

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FMRM-2022-0019Russian Science Foundation 21-74-30003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The species diversity in the genus Coelastrella is not yet fully unclarified, particularly with regard to algal communities in ecosystems characterized by extreme climatic conditions, such as those found in polar regions. The study objects were strains VKM Al-421, VKM Al-488, and VKM Al-489 isolated from the soils of the Far North, Russian Federation. The analysis of the 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 fragment revealed that these strains represent a unique phylogenetic lineage outside the 'core Coelastrella' group. The species status is also confirmed by morphological differences between the studied species and its sister species (absence of edges) (lack of ribs), interspecific genetic distances, the presence of compensatory base changes in the internal transcribed spacers ITS1 and ITS2, as well as the results of delimitation using various algorithms applied to both the full-length fragment and shorter barcodes. The strain VKM Al-421 of the new species exhibits a fatty acid profile characteristic of the genus Coelastrella; however, it differs from closely related strains due to the presence of Δ7,10,13-hexadecatrienoic acid and a notably high concentration of α-linolenic acid. These features may indicate an adaptation to polar regions. In addition, the studied strain has the potential to be used as a producer of α-linolenic acid, which is essential for human health. A detailed comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different DNA barcodes showed that ITS2 is the most promising for distinguishing species within Coelastrella. Among all species delimitation algorithms, GMYC is the most accurate when working with variable barcodes. At the same time, the less laborious KoT algorithm demonstrated a similar level of accuracy for ITS1.

Indexed as

ChlorophytaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicSoil MicrobiologyArctic RegionsDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFatty AcidsPhylogenyRussiaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFatty Acids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.