Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423642›Full record

ArticleInternational endodontic journal2025

Clinical validation of a proposed diagnostic classification for pulpitis.

R N Karrar, S G Craig, H F Duncan, S A Abushouk, S Y Elfiel, F T Lundy, M Clarke, I A El-Karim, Reliability Assessment Group

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R N KarrarFaculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
S G CraigSchool of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-751X
H F DuncanDivision of Restorative Dentistry & Periodontology, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-2379
S A AbushoukFaculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
S Y ElfielFaculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
F T LundySchool of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-1150
M ClarkeSchool of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2926-7257
I A El-KarimSchool of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5314-7378
Reliability Assessment Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDetermine the reliability and clinical validity of the Wolters classification of pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study in which patients with pulpitis were included. Based on history, clinical and radiographic examination, participants were categorized into initial, mild, moderate or severe pulpitis based on Wolters classification and received treatment as suggested in the classification. The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) classification was used for comparison. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 12 months. Classification reliability was assessed by measuring the interrater agreement using Fleiss' Kappa. Construct validity was assessed by cluster analysis using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Predictive validity was determined by the association of treatment outcome with the diagnostic category. All statistical analyses were conducted using R v4.3.1; a p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsNinety-two patients were included in the study. The interrater reliability showed fair agreement for Wolters classification (Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.595), compared with substantial agreement (κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889) for the AAE classification. Association of Wolters classification with output of unsupervised K-mode cluster analysis showed that the use of a three-category model may improve discrimination of pulpitis subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe categories. The revised classification model demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for accurate discrimination between mild and severe pulpitis and 83% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for classifying moderate pulpitis. There was no significant difference between these revised diagnostic categories considering treatment outcome, suggesting good predictive validity (p > .05). Compared with the AAE classification, the new classification in conjunction with proposed treatments resulted in preserving 87% of the pulps compared with historical treatment.

conclusionsWe propose that a revised Wolters classification model is suitable for determining mild, moderate, and severe pulpitis to aid in clinical management of pulpitis.

Indexed as

PulpitisAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Resultscluster analysisdiagnosispulpitisvital pulp treatment

Identifiers

PMID40423642
PMCPMC12254530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.