ArticleInternational endodontic journal2025
Clinical validation of a proposed diagnostic classification for pulpitis.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and safety of water laser-assisted endodontic-periodontal therapy: A retrospective controlled study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Pulpotomy for an Immature Permanent Tooth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Using Cold Ceramic.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Biological markers and pulp pH values for the clinical prediction of suppurative pulpitis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in oral health management: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical validation of a proposed diagnostic classification for pulpitis.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimDetermine the reliability and clinical validity of the Wolters classification of pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study in which patients with pulpitis were included. Based on history, clinical and radiographic examination, participants were categorized into initial, mild, moderate or severe pulpitis based on Wolters classification and received treatment as suggested in the classification. The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) classification was used for comparison. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 12 months. Classification reliability was assessed by measuring the interrater agreement using Fleiss' Kappa. Construct validity was assessed by cluster analysis using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Predictive validity was determined by the association of treatment outcome with the diagnostic category. All statistical analyses were conducted using R v4.3.1; a p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsNinety-two patients were included in the study. The interrater reliability showed fair agreement for Wolters classification (Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.595), compared with substantial agreement (κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889) for the AAE classification. Association of Wolters classification with output of unsupervised K-mode cluster analysis showed that the use of a three-category model may improve discrimination of pulpitis subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe categories. The revised classification model demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for accurate discrimination between mild and severe pulpitis and 83% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for classifying moderate pulpitis. There was no significant difference between these revised diagnostic categories considering treatment outcome, suggesting good predictive validity (p > .05). Compared with the AAE classification, the new classification in conjunction with proposed treatments resulted in preserving 87% of the pulps compared with historical treatment.
conclusionsWe propose that a revised Wolters classification model is suitable for determining mild, moderate, and severe pulpitis to aid in clinical management of pulpitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.