ArticleEpilepsia2025
Deep learning on brief interictal intracranial recordings can accurately characterize seizure onset zones.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEpilepsy is a debilitating disorder affecting more than 50 million people worldwide, and one third of patients continue to have seizures despite maximal medical management. If patients' seizures localize to a discrete brain region, termed a seizure onset zone, resection may be curative. Localization is often confirmed with stereotactic electroencephalography; however, this may require patients to stay in the hospital for weeks to capture spontaneous seizures. Automated localization of seizure onset zones could therefore improve presurgical evaluation and decrease morbidity.
methodsUsing more than 1 000 000 interictal stereotactic electroencephalography segments collected from 78 patients, we performed five-fold cross-validation and testing on a multichannel, multiscale, one-dimensional convolutional neural network to classify seizure onset zones.
resultsAcross held-out test sets, our models achieved a seizure onset zone classification sensitivity of .702 (95% confidence interval [CI] = .549-.805), specificity of .741 (95% CI = .652-.835), and accuracy of .738 (95% CI = .687-.795), which was significantly better than models trained on random labels. The models performed well across the entire brain, with top five region performance demonstrating accuracies between 70.0% and 88.4%. When split by outcomes, the models performed significantly better on patients with favorable Engel outcomes after resection or who were responsive neurostimulation responders. Finally, SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanation) value analysis on median-normalized input data assigned consistently high feature importance to interictal spikes and large deflections, whereas similar analyses on histogram-equalized data revealed differences in feature importance assignments to low-amplitude segments. SIGNIFICANCE: This work serves as evidence that deep learning on brief interictal intracranial data can classify seizure onset zones across the brain. Furthermore, our findings corroborate current understandings of interictal epileptiform discharges and may help uncover novel interictal morphologies. Clinical application of our models may reduce dependence on recorded seizures for localization and shorten presurgical evaluation time for drug-resistant epilepsy patients, reducing patient morbidity and hospital costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.