ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
When the Past Fades: Detecting Phylogenetic Signal with SatuTe.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In phylogenetics, the phenomenon of saturation is well known, although its influence on tree reconstruction lacks a systematic and well-founded method. Here, we propose a new measure of the phylogenetic information shared between two subtrees connected by a branch in a phylogeny. This measure generalizes the concept of saturation between two sequences to a theory of saturation between subtrees, whose implementation we provide as the versatile program SatuTe. We describe different usages of SatuTe, identifying which branches in a tree are phylogenetically informative and which alignment regions support a given branch. As an example, we discuss the Tree of Life reconstruction from ribosomal proteins and the 16S rRNA gene, with emphasis on the two-domain versus three-domain hypotheses. For the branch leading to Eukaryota, we show that most ribosomal proteins contain a strong phylogenetic signal, whereas some regions of the 16S rRNA gene have lost phylogenetic information. Thus, SatuTe opens new insights into phylogenetic inference and complements standard phylogenetic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.