Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423571›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Using Machine Learning to Analyze Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules.

Alfie-Louise R Brownless, Elisa Rheaume, Katie M Kuo, Shina C L Kamerlin, James C Gumbart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alfie-Louise R BrownlessInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Elisa RheaumeInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Katie M KuoSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Shina C L KamerlinSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
James C GumbartSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-7842

Funding

Integrative and Quantitative Biosciences Accelerated Training EnvironmentT32GM142616 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI James C. Gumbart, Peng Qiu · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142616Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques have become powerful tools in both industrial and academic settings. Their ability to facilitate analysis of complex data and generation of predictive insights is transforming how scientific problems are approached across a wide range of disciplines. In this tutorial, we present a cursory introduction to three widely used ML techniques─logistic regression, random forest, and multilayer perceptron─applied toward analyzing molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory data. We employ our chosen ML models to the study of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain interacting with the receptor ACE2. We develop a pipeline for processing MD simulation trajectory data and identifying residues that significantly impact the stability of the complex.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Machine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusHumansProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2ACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40423571
PMCPMC12147208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.