Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423563›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2025

Risk Prediction of Unplanned Extubation in Inpatients Using Random Forest and Logistic Regression Models.

Hongyi Mou, Akmal Ergashev, Bingqi Zhou, Na Ye, Xueyan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongyi MouDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2167-6165
Akmal Ergashev
Bingqi Zhou
Na Ye
Xueyan Li

Funding

Wenzhou Science &Technology Bureau Y20210076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned extubation (UEX) represents a significant risk event in hospitalized patients and is considered one of the most serious safety concerns. Prevention and early detection of these events have become essential components of high-quality nursing care.

objectiveTo compare random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of UEX.

methodsIn total, 775 UEX events were selected from the adverse nursing events database of a hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2022 as the observation group. In addition, 775 planned extubation events were included from the database of hospitalized patients during the same period through 1:1 propensity score matching across various inpatient departments. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to form the development group and the validation group. Both random forest and logistic regression models were constructed. Their performances were compared using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsIn addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified individuals aged 65 years and over (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43-4.59), male (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.27), impaired awareness (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44-4.56), concurrent dual catheters (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77-6.32), presence of 3 or more catheters (OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44-8.97), catheter indwelling time exceeding 1 week but <1 month (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41) or more than 1 month (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.55-13.10), and the presence of medium-risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) or high-risk catheters (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17) with secondary fixation (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12) as influential factors for UEX events in inpatients. Several variables, including catheter indwelling time, number of coexisting catheters, age, secondary fixation, and catheter grade, were selected for predicting UEX events using the random forest model. The AUC of the random forest prediction model was 0.812, while the AUC of the logistic regression prediction model was slightly lower at 0.793.

conclusionThe random forest model outperforms the logistic regression model in predicting inpatient UEX events. However, the logistic regression model remains valuable for its ability to provide intuitive explanations of the results.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationInpatientsAgedChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRandom ForestRisk AssessmentRisk Factorslogistic regressionprediction modelrandom forestunplanned extubation

Identifiers

PMID40423563
PMCPMC12363295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.