ArticleJournal of patient safety2025
Risk Prediction of Unplanned Extubation in Inpatients Using Random Forest and Logistic Regression Models.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Risk Stratification Model for Unplanned Extubation a Chinese Tertiary Hospital Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study Based on Nursing-Related and Ventilation Characteristics.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnplanned extubation (UEX) represents a significant risk event in hospitalized patients and is considered one of the most serious safety concerns. Prevention and early detection of these events have become essential components of high-quality nursing care.
objectiveTo compare random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of UEX.
methodsIn total, 775 UEX events were selected from the adverse nursing events database of a hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2022 as the observation group. In addition, 775 planned extubation events were included from the database of hospitalized patients during the same period through 1:1 propensity score matching across various inpatient departments. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to form the development group and the validation group. Both random forest and logistic regression models were constructed. Their performances were compared using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsIn addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified individuals aged 65 years and over (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43-4.59), male (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.27), impaired awareness (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44-4.56), concurrent dual catheters (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77-6.32), presence of 3 or more catheters (OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44-8.97), catheter indwelling time exceeding 1 week but <1 month (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41) or more than 1 month (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.55-13.10), and the presence of medium-risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) or high-risk catheters (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17) with secondary fixation (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12) as influential factors for UEX events in inpatients. Several variables, including catheter indwelling time, number of coexisting catheters, age, secondary fixation, and catheter grade, were selected for predicting UEX events using the random forest model. The AUC of the random forest prediction model was 0.812, while the AUC of the logistic regression prediction model was slightly lower at 0.793.
conclusionThe random forest model outperforms the logistic regression model in predicting inpatient UEX events. However, the logistic regression model remains valuable for its ability to provide intuitive explanations of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.