Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423555›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Assessing the Corn Belt as an anthropogenic barrier to migrating landbirds in the United States.

Fengyi Guo, Jeffrey J Buler, Adriaan M Dokter, Kyle G Horton, Emily B Cohen, Daniel Sheldon, Jaclyn A Smolinsky, David S Wilcove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the Corn Belt as an anthropogenic barrier to migrating landbirds in the United States.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Seasonal variation in trans-oceanic flight and island use in a migratory falcon.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fengyi GuoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5426-324X
Jeffrey J BulerDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2696-847X
Adriaan M DokterCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-066X
Kyle G HortonDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-3081
Emily B CohenAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-4278
Daniel SheldonCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-2432
Jaclyn A SmolinskyDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-5313
David S WilcoveDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-0503

Funding

Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell UniversityDivision of Environmental Biology DEB-2146052High Meadows FoundationNational Institute of Food and Agriculture DEL-00774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migrating landbirds adjust their flight and stopover behaviors to efficiently cross inhospitable geographies, such as the Gulf of Mexico and the Sahara Desert. In addition to these natural barriers, birds may increasingly encounter anthropogenic barriers created by large-scale changes in land use. One such barrier could be the Corn Belt in the Midwest United States, where 76.4% of precolonial vegetation (forest and grassland combined) has been replaced by agricultural and urban areas, primarily corn fields. We used 5 years of data from 47 weather radar stations in the United States to compare the population-level flight patterns of migrating landbirds crossing the Corn Belt and the forested landscapes south and north of it in spring and autumn. We also examined the impacts of the Corn Belt relative to the Gulf of Mexico on the stopover behavior of migrating birds by comparing changes in the proportion of migrants that stop to rest (stopover-to-passage ratio [SPR]) relative to distance from both barriers. Birds showed increased meridional airspeeds and stronger selection for tailwinds when crossing the Corn Belt compared with forested landscapes. For birds crossing the Gulf of Mexico, the highest proportion of migrants stopped to rest after crossing the Gulf, and SPR decreased sharply as distance from the shoreline increased. We did not find this pattern after migrants crossed the Corn Belt, although the SPR increased in the Corn Belt as birds approached the down-route forest boundary in both seasons. This weaker pattern for stopover propensity after crossing the Corn Belt is likely due to its narrower width, the availability of small forest patches throughout the Corn Belt, and the subset of species affected, compared with the gulf. We recommend restoring stepping stones of forest in the Corn Belt and protecting woodlands along the Gulf Coast to help landbirds successfully negotiate both barriers.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimal MigrationAnthropogenic EffectsBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesZea maysAnimalsSeasonsUnited Statesbarrera migratoriacambio en el uso de sueloCinturón del MaízCorn BeltGolfo de MéxicoGulf of Mexicolandbird migrationland‐use changemigración de aves terrestresmigration barrierornitología con radarradar ornithologyrelación escala‐pasajeREPselección de vientoSPRstopover‐to‐passage ratiowind selection停歇与通过比率(SPR)、风向选择关键词: 迁徙屏障土地利用变化墨西哥湾玉米带陆鸟迁徙雷达鸟类学

Identifiers

PMID40423555
PMCPMC12451512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.