Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423546›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2025

Opportunities to improve environmental sustainability of pork production through genetics.

Jack C M Dekkers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3150, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-7577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding programs in pigs primarily aim to reduce the cost of production but, because of the strong parallel effects of traits on the cost of production and environmental impacts, current breeding programs also substantially reduce the environmental impacts of pork production, although these reductions may be overestimated if the possible use of manure as a source of fertilizer is not accounted for. The purpose of this review is to summarize and explore opportunities that exist to further enhance these impacts by 1) changing the emphasis on traits in breeding programs, 2) including new traits, 3) integrating genetics and nutrition, and 4) transgenics and gene editing. Apart from accelerating rates of gain for productivity and efficiency at the commercial level, limited opportunities exist to further enhance reductions in environmental impacts by changing the emphasis on traits that are currently under selection, because of the high correlation between the impacts of these traits on cost of production and environmental impacts. However, opportunities exist to include traits related to resilience to disease and heat stress, methane emission (enteric and manure), and the efficient use of dietary nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and other ingredients, which all appear to have a genetic component. The limited research available to date suggests that genetic differences in efficiency and environmental impacts are smaller when pigs are fed diets that are tailored to their nutritional requirements, suggesting fewer genotype by diet interactions under such nutritional strategies. Selection for performance when fed diets that are tailored to meet the specific nutritional requirements of the line, or even the individual pig, can direct selection pressure to improvement of efficiency of the use of specific diet components. The effectiveness of this approach, however, depends on the accuracy of the nutritional models that are employed to determine nutrient requirements, as well as the accuracy with which these requirements can be characterized at the genetic level. Opportunities also exist to use transgenics or gene editing to provide solutions for anti-nutritional factors that many feedstuffs contain. Most emphasis on further reducing the environmental impact of pork production through genetics should focus on the grow-finish phase because it has the largest environmental impact and mitigation opportunities. Although this is expected to translate into additional reductions in environmental impacts of the reproduction phase, research into genetic selection or interventions that are specific to this phase is also needed.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBreedingAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesDietEnvironmentSwineenvironmental sustainabilitygenetic improvementgeneticspork ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID40423546
PMCPMC12107699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.