ReviewToxics2025
A Review of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds from Plants: Research Progress and Future Prospects.
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiation of wild-type and PAP1-overexpressing tobacco by volatile organic compound profiling using TP-SESI mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Room-temperature VOC detection using light-driven metal oxide heterojunctions: principles, challenges, and prospects.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Synergistic Regulation of Postharvest Physiology and Biochemical Quality of Peach (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Combined Metabolome and Transcriptome Analysis of Floral Organ Development inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biogenic volatile organic compound emission characteristics of dominant tree species in temperate broad-leaved Korean pine forests in Northeast China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Decoding plant volatile stress signals across scales: from molecular responses to ecosystem dynamics.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Tuning Nanofibrous Sensor Performance in Selective Detection of B-VOCs by MIP-NP Loading.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emitted by plants contribute to secondary air pollution through photochemical reactions in sunlight. Due to the influence of multiple factors, accurately characterizing and quantifying the emission of BVOCs from plant sources is challenging, which poses significant obstacles to the effective management and control of BVOCs. Therefore, this paper summarizes the emission mechanisms of BVOCs from plants, explores the primary factors influencing variations in the emission rates of these compounds, and evaluates the advantages and limitations of contemporary "measurement-modeling" methods for characterizing BVOC emissions. It is concluded that current measurement techniques still need to be further developed to meet the criteria of simplicity, affordability, and high precision simultaneously, and in terms of modeling and prediction studies, there is a lack of in-depth research on the atmospheric chemistry of BVOCs and the synergistic effects of multiple factors. Finally, it is suggested to leverage interdisciplinary strengths to develop advanced measurement technologies and high-resolution models for monitoring volatile compounds. Additionally, strategically selecting low-BVOC tree species in pollution-vulnerable urban areas-contingent on rigorous ecological assessments-combined with stringent controls on anthropogenic precursors (e.g., anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (AVOCs)) could serve as a complementary measure to mitigate secondary pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.