Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423361›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025

Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Predicting Late Leprosy Diagnosis by Physical Disability Grade in Brazil (2018-2022).

Lucia Rolim Santana de Freitas, José Antônio Oliveira de Freitas, Gerson Oliveira Penna, Elisabeth Carmen Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia Rolim Santana de FreitasFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-3571
José Antônio Oliveira de FreitasDepartamento de Matemática, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0269-7262
Gerson Oliveira PennaEscola de Governo Fiocruz Brasília, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasília 70904-130, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-536X
Elisabeth Carmen DuarteFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severity of physical disability at leprosy diagnosis reflects the timeliness of case detection and the effectiveness of disease surveillance. This study evaluates machine learning models to predict factors associated with late leprosy diagnosis-defined as grade 2 physical disability (G2D)-in Brazil from 2018 to 2022. Using an observational cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System and trained four machine learning models: Random Forest, LightGBM, CatBoost, XGBoost, and an Ensemble model. Model performance was assessed through accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), recall, precision, F1 score, specificity, and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC). An increasing trend in G2D prevalence was observed, averaging 11.6% over the study period and rising to 13.1% in 2022. The Ensemble model and LightGBM demonstrated the highest predictive performance, particularly in the north and northeast regions (accuracy: 0.85, AUC-ROC: 0.93, recall: 0.90, F1 score: 0.83, MCC: 0.70), with similar results in other regions. Key predictors of G2D included the number of nerves affected, clinical form, education level, and case detection mode. These findings underscore the potential of machine learning to enhance early detection strategies and reduce the burden of disability in leprosy, particularly in regions with persistent health disparities.

Indexed as

disabilityepidemiologyleprosymachine learningneglected diseasesrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40423361
PMCPMC12115529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.