ReviewToxins2025
Clinical Evidence of Bee Venom Acupuncture for Ankle Pain: A Review of Clinical Research.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal interoception regulates joint homeostasis and PGE2-induced pain: implication of disease-modifying treatment.Bone research · 2026Review
- From Toxin to Therapy: Biomedical Applications of Bee Venom in Cancer, Diabetes, and Neurodegenerative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of ankle pain in adults is 9-15%, with up to 45% of sports-related injuries attributed to ankle pain and injuries. If ankle pain is not controlled in a timely manner, it can lead to ankle instability, resulting in further damage, recurrence of pain, and secondary injuries. The present study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential and safety profile of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) in the management of ankle pain. Ten electronic databases were searched for articles published up to March 2025. We included clinical studies that utilized BVA for the treatment of ankle pain and studies that included pain- and function-related assessment tools. The safety of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) was assessed by extracting adverse events from the included studies and categorizing them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A total of 14 clinical studies were selected, of which 9 were case reports, 2 were case-controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The conditions causing ankle pain were mostly traumatic (42.9%), followed by inflammatory (21.4%) and neuropathic disorders (14.3%). BVA was applied at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/mL, with a per-session volume ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mL. In most studies, BVA was reported to improve both ankle pain and function simultaneously. Among the 14 studies, four participants reported adverse events following BVA treatment, all of which were classified as grade 1 or grade 2, indicating mild to moderate severity. This review suggests that BVA may be recommended for controlling ankle pain based on clinical evidence. However, the number of high-quality RCTs is limited, and half of the studies did not report side effects, indicating the need for further clinical research to verify its safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.