ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Rose Bengal-Chitosan Nanocomposites for Oral Administration.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rose Bengal (RB) holds promise for therapeutic applications in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract but faces significant limitations due to poor bioavailability and stability in the GI environment. This in vitro proof-of-concept study aimed to develop an oral drug delivery system using self-assembled RB-chitosan (RBCS) nanocomposites formed via electrostatic interactions. RBCS nanocomposites exhibited high drug loading efficiency (87%) and a uniform particle size (~443 nm), with physicochemical analyses confirming molecular interactions and structural stability. However, in vitro studies revealed poor and highly variable drug release in simulated gastric fluids (SGFs), underlining the need for further optimization. To address these limitations, RBCS nanocomposites were encapsulated within well-established alginate beads (AlgBs). Among the tested systems, RBCS20-AlgBs were selected as the optimal one, forming a gastroresistant platform. Encapsulation mitigated burst release, enhanced structural integrity, and enabled sustained RB release under intestinal conditions. Swelling studies demonstrated that RBCS20-AlgBs maintained controlled hydration, preventing premature disintegration. Mathematical modeling indicated a matrix relaxation-driven release mechanism, with RBCS20-AlgBs demonstrating improved reproducibility compared to RB-loaded AlgBs (RB-AlgBs). Future studies should focus on evaluating in vivo performance to confirm the system's efficacy for oral administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.