ArticleTransfusion2025
How experienced ICU specialists make decisions on prophylactic platelet transfusions-A qualitative study.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlatelet transfusions are frequently used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as prophylaxis against bleeding complications. Several guidelines exist on when to administer platelet transfusions in the ICU, but studies indicate that these guidelines are not necessarily followed. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand how experienced ICU physicians make decisions on prescribing prophylactic platelet transfusions and to gain insight into their general concerns and views on blood product transfusions.
designDescriptive qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with clinicians working in ICUs in Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsWe identified four main themes influencing the decision to prescribe prophylactic platelet transfusions: Guidelines, social and cultural aspects (including religion), previous personal experiences, and fear of consequences. DISCUSSION: Most doctors expressed uncertainty about balancing benefits and harm. Platelet transfusions were often used to prevent bleeding despite uncertainty on the effect and were typically triggered by fear of consequences when performing a procedure, which was an important driver. The departmental culture and colleagues' attitudes were far more important influencers on decision-making than guideline recommendations. Most doctors thought it was possible for blood products to transfer unknown and potentially harmful substances to patients, although this did not appear to influence their daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.