ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Segmentation of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: Introducing DRU-Net and Multi-Lens Distortion.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming resolution constraints in automated colony counting via a high-performance deep learning framework using SAHI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- OKEN: A Supervised Evolutionary Optimizable Dimensionality Reduction Framework for Whole Slide Image Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increased workload in pathology laboratories today means automated tools such as artificial intelligence models can be useful, helping pathologists with their tasks. In this paper, we propose a segmentation model (DRU-Net) that can provide a delineation of human non-small cell lung carcinomas and an augmentation method that can improve classification results. The proposed model is a fused combination of truncated pre-trained DenseNet201 and ResNet101V2 as a patch-wise classifier, followed by a lightweight U-Net as a refinement model. Two datasets (Norwegian Lung Cancer Biobank and Haukeland University Lung Cancer cohort) were used to develop the model. The DRU-Net model achieved an average of 0.91 Dice similarity coefficient. The proposed spatial augmentation method (multi-lens distortion) improved the Dice similarity coefficient from 0.88 to 0.91. Our findings show that selecting image patches that specifically include regions of interest leads to better results for the patch-wise classifier compared to other sampling methods. A qualitative analysis by pathology experts showed that the DRU-Net model was generally successful in tumor detection. Results in the test set showed some areas of false-positive and false-negative segmentation in the periphery, particularly in tumors with inflammatory and reactive changes. In summary, the presented DRU-Net model demonstrated the best performance on the segmentation task, and the proposed augmentation technique proved to improve the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.