ArticleJournal of imaging2025
3D-NASE: A Novel 3D CT Nasal Attention-Based Segmentation Ensemble.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in CT scans is crucial for disease assessment, treatment planning, and surgical navigation. It also facilitates the advanced computational modeling of airflow dynamics and enhances endoscopic surgery preparation. This work presents a novel ensemble framework for 3D nasal CT segmentation that synergistically combines CNN-based and transformer-based architectures, 3D-NASE. By integrating 3D U-Net, UNETR, Swin UNETR, SegResNet, DAF3D, and V-Net with majority and soft voting strategies, our approach leverages both local details and global context to improve segmentation accuracy and robustness. Results on the NasalSeg dataset demonstrate that the proposed ensemble method surpasses previous state-of-the-art results by achieving a 35.88% improvement in the DICE score and reducing the standard deviation by 4.53%. These promising results highlight the potential of our method to advance clinical workflows in diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical navigation while also promoting further research into computationally efficient and highly accurate segmentation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.