Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422999›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

AI-Powered Object Detection in Radiology: Current Models, Challenges, and Future Direction.

Abdussalam Elhanashi, Sergio Saponara, Qinghe Zheng, Nawal Almutairi, Yashbir Singh, Shiba Kuanar, Farzana Ali, Orhan Unal, Shahriar Faghani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Moral diversity and the challenge of responsibility in AI-CDSS.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdussalam ElhanashiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2514-1585
Sergio SaponaraDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.
Qinghe ZhengSchool of Intelligence Engineering, Shandong Management University, Jinan 250100, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-7323
Nawal AlmutairiInformation Technology Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 145111, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-5668
Yashbir SinghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5848-7072
Shiba KuanarDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Farzana AliDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7111-5268
Orhan UnalDepartments of Radiology, School of Medicine, Medical Physics University of Wisconsin-Madison, Public Health Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-6744
Shahriar FaghaniDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-2971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based object detection in radiology can assist in clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. This article examines the AI-based object detection models currently used in many imaging modalities, including X-ray Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), and Ultrasound (US). The key models from the convolutional neural network (CNN) as well as the contemporary transformer and hybrid models are analyzed based on their ability to detect pathological features, such as tumors, lesions, and tissue abnormalities. In addition, this review offers a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of these models in terms of accuracy, robustness, and speed in real clinical settings. The common issues related to these models, including limited data, annotation quality, and interpretability of AI decisions, are discussed in detail. Moreover, the need for strong applicable models across different populations and imaging modalities are addressed. The importance of privacy and ethics in general data use as well as safety and regulations for healthcare data are emphasized. The future potential of these models lies in their accessibility in low resource settings, usability in shared learning spaces while maintaining privacy, and improvement in diagnostic accuracy through multimodal learning. This review also highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration among artificial intelligence researchers, radiologists, and policymakers. Such cooperation is essential to address current challenges and to fully realize the potential of AI-based object detection in radiology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkdiagnostic accuracyobject detectionradiology

Identifiers

PMID40422999
PMCPMC12112695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.