ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Deep-Learning Approaches for Cervical Cytology Nuclei Segmentation in Whole Slide Images.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate Segmentation of Overlapping Cervical Cells Using an Optimized Deep Learning Framework for Cytology Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Biomarker Interpretation on Cytology Cell Blocks: Foundations and Emerging Opportunities in Spatial Pathobiology.The American journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cytology: Opportunities and Limitations in Screening, Triage, and Diagnostic Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Robust Cell-Level Classification for Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology Using Deep Transfer Learning: A Multi-Source Study Addressing Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Joint segmentation and classification of cervical cells using U-Net and CNN ensemble for early detection of cervical cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-slide imaging (WSI) in cytopathology poses challenges related to segmentation accuracy, computational efficiency, and image acquisition artifacts. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep-learning models for instance segmentation in cervical cytology, benchmarking them against state-of-the-art methods on both public and institutional datasets. We tested three architectures-U-Net, vision transformer (ViT), and Detectron2-and evaluated their performance on the ISBI 2014 and CNseg datasets using panoptic quality (PQ), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and intersection over union (IoU). All models were trained on CNseg and tested on an independent institutional dataset. Data preprocessing involved manual annotation using QuPath, patch extraction guided by GeoJSON files, and exclusion of regions containing less than 60% cytologic material. Our models achieved superior segmentation performance on public datasets, reaching up to 98% PQ. Performance decreased on the institutional dataset, likely due to differences in image acquisition and the presence of blurred nuclei. Nevertheless, the models were able to detect blurred nuclei, highlighting their robustness in suboptimal imaging conditions. In conclusion, the proposed models offer an accurate and efficient solution for instance segmentation in cytology WSI. These results support the development of reliable AI-powered tools for digital cytology, with potential applications in automated screening and diagnostic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.