ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Venous Hemodynamic Dysfunction and Recurrent Miscarriage: Case Series and Literature Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Maternal venous hemodynamic dysfunction is an intrinsic part of the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether venous hemodynamic dysfunction is present in women with a history of (unexplained) recurrent miscarriage, and to link this pilot observation to reported data in the literature. (2) Methods: A retrospective search of hospital records was conducted to find data on recurrent miscarriage and hemodynamics assessment prior to conception. We also performed a scoping search of the literature regarding the association between recurrent miscarriage and maternal hemodynamics, reproductive outcomes, maternal complications, neonatal complications, and long-term cardiovascular function in women and their offspring. (3) Results: Six out of nine women with a history of recurrent miscarriage had preconception venous hemodynamic dysfunction. This observation is in line with the reported data on reduced venous reserves in association with low plasma volume in women with recurrent miscarriage, and adds to the reported link between recurrent miscarriage, poor reproductive outcomes, and chronic cardiovascular disease. (4) Discussion: This retrospective observational cohort supports an association between venous hemodynamic dysfunction and recurrent miscarriage that is corroborated by data reported in the literature. Abnormal venous hemodynamic function can be improved before conception, and this opens a new and currently unexplored pathway in the management of recurrent miscarriage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.