Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422964›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Venous Hemodynamic Dysfunction and Recurrent Miscarriage: Case Series and Literature Review.

Elisa Sabattini, Helena Van Kerrebroeck, Wilfried Gyselaers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa SabattiniDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-4322
Helena Van KerrebroeckDepartment Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Wilfried GyselaersDepartment Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, 3600 Genk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-434X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Maternal venous hemodynamic dysfunction is an intrinsic part of the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether venous hemodynamic dysfunction is present in women with a history of (unexplained) recurrent miscarriage, and to link this pilot observation to reported data in the literature. (2) Methods: A retrospective search of hospital records was conducted to find data on recurrent miscarriage and hemodynamics assessment prior to conception. We also performed a scoping search of the literature regarding the association between recurrent miscarriage and maternal hemodynamics, reproductive outcomes, maternal complications, neonatal complications, and long-term cardiovascular function in women and their offspring. (3) Results: Six out of nine women with a history of recurrent miscarriage had preconception venous hemodynamic dysfunction. This observation is in line with the reported data on reduced venous reserves in association with low plasma volume in women with recurrent miscarriage, and adds to the reported link between recurrent miscarriage, poor reproductive outcomes, and chronic cardiovascular disease. (4) Discussion: This retrospective observational cohort supports an association between venous hemodynamic dysfunction and recurrent miscarriage that is corroborated by data reported in the literature. Abnormal venous hemodynamic function can be improved before conception, and this opens a new and currently unexplored pathway in the management of recurrent miscarriage.

Indexed as

congestionpreconceptionrecurrent miscarriagevenous Dopplervenous hemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID40422964
PMCPMC12111838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.