ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Spontaneous Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Rare Cause of Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When thrombus meets intracranial dissection: a tricky decision for intravenous thrombolysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Antithrombogenic coated self-expanding stent (pEGASUS-HPC) for the treatment of intracranial dissections of the cerebral arteries in acute stroke: a multicenter study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Ruptured Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms: Integrating Microsurgical Expertise, Endovascular Challenges, and AI-Driven Risk Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dissection of the V4 vertebral artery (VA) is the most prevalent form of intracranial dissection, which can manifest either as ischemia or as a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Patient outcomes are significantly affected by their initial presentation; ischemic symptoms often indicate that the dissection remains primarily subintimal or within the medial layer, though it can occasionally extend to the basilar artery. In contrast, patients with ruptured VA dissection (VAD) experience a considerably higher mortality rate, as the dissection can reach the adventitial layer, heightening the risk of recurrent hemorrhage. It can show fluctuating imaging findings, making an accurate diagnosis and timely treatment essential. Currently, there are no established diagnostic criteria for VAD, and its diagnosis largely depends on imaging. The presence of intramural hematoma, identified via three-dimensional, black-blood, T1-weighted imaging, has been recognized as the most reliable indicator for diagnosing VAD and is crucial for establishing a definitive diagnosis. DSA remains a fundamental diagnostic technique not only in hemorrhagic patients but also in ischemic patients. The medical treatment of ischemic patients has not yet been well defined, and evidence-based data are lacking. This review aims to summarize the main clinical, pathophysiological, and neuroradiological features of intracranial VAD presenting with ischemic stroke, providing to clinicians the available information in order to individualize the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.