Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422957›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

The Ross Procedure in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.

Nabil Dib, Nancy Poirier, Ismail Bouhout, Paul Khairy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nabil DibDepartment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-6991
Nancy PoirierDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.
Ismail BouhoutDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.
Paul KhairyDepartment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-3800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic valve disease accounts for approximately 5% of all congenital heart defects in children. Choosing the optimal valve replacement in this population is challenging, as it must ensure durability, accommodate growth, and minimize the need for long-term anticoagulation. Biological valves do not require anticoagulation but lack durability and growth potential, leading to frequent reoperations. Mechanical valves offer longevity but necessitate lifelong anticoagulation and do not grow with the child. Among the available surgical options, the Ross procedure has emerged as a preferred approach due to its favorable hemodynamic performance, growth potential, and freedom from anticoagulation. First described in 1967, this technique involves replacing the diseased aortic valve with a pulmonary autograft and reconstructing the right ventricular outflow tract using a human or non-human valve substitute. Despite its advantages, the procedure is technically demanding, has a considerable learning curve, and transforms a single-valve pathology into a bivalvular condition. This narrative review provides an updated perspective on the Ross procedure in children, focusing on long-term survival, reoperation rates, and the role of percutaneous valve replacement in delaying surgical reintervention. By synthesizing the latest evidence, we aim to clarify the current standing of the Ross procedure as a durable and effective solution for pediatric aortic valve disease.

Indexed as

aortic valve diseasecongenital heart diseasepediatric cardiologyRoss procedure

Identifiers

PMID40422957
PMCPMC12112538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.