ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Animal Experimental Study on Delayed Implantation in a Severely Atrophic Alveolar Ridge Reconstructed Using a 3D-Printed Bioactive Glass Scaffold: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofabrication for complex tissue regeneration: a scoping review of translational gaps in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Rat Calvarial Guided Bone Regeneration Model: Preclinical Insights into Biomaterials, Barrier Design, and Systemic Modulators.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a scaffold was designed using 3-Matic software 12.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and fabricated via Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printing technology, followed by a mechanical property evaluation. The scaffold was bilaterally implanted into mandibular bone defect models in four Beagle dogs to facilitate guided alveolar bone regeneration. After 12 weeks, samples were harvested from two dogs for radiographic and histopathological evaluations. In the remaining two dogs, two dental implants were placed into the scaffold sites. After an additional 12 weeks, samples were harvested for further radiographic and histopathological assessments. (1) Compression testing of the scaffold demonstrated a compressive strength of 24.77 ± 2.36 MPa. (2) Three of the implantation sites exhibited poor wound healing and exposure of the bone grafts early post-surgery (4 weeks), with an exposure rate of 37.5%. (3) Micro-CT imaging revealed a uniform distribution of newly formed bone within the scaffold, with an average bone height of 4.05 ± 0.55 mm and a bone volume fraction of 43.93 ± 4.68%. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the presence of vascularized tissue, non-calcified bone, and newly calcified bone within the scaffold. Additionally, newly formed calcified bone and vascularized tissue were observed at the interface between the implant and the scaffold. These findings suggest that DLP 3D-printed A-W bioactive glass scaffolds represent a promising approach for guided alveolar bone regeneration in dental implant applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.