ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Advancements in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering: The Role of Melt Electrowriting in 3D-Printed Scaffold Fabrication.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of limb replantation and transplantation: global research trends and hotspots (2001-2025).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering: Biological Principles, Engineered Substitutes, and Preclinical Outcomes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Composite Bioactive Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Repair: Implications for Oral Surgery.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Review
- Gynecologic postoperative anti-adhesion barriers: From biomaterials to barrier development.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal tissue injuries of the bone, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, and skeletal muscles are among the most common injuries experienced in medicine and become increasingly problematic in cases of significant tissue damage, such as nonunion bone defects and volumetric muscle loss. Current gold standard treatment options for musculoskeletal injuries, although effective, have limited capability to fully restore native tissue structure and function. To overcome this challenge, three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have emerged as promising therapeutic options for tissue regeneration. Melt electrowriting (MEW), a recently developed advanced 3D printing technique, has gained significant traction in the field of tissue regeneration because of its ability to fabricate complex customizable scaffolds via high-precision microfiber deposition. The tailorability at microscale levels offered by MEW allows for enhanced recapitulation of the tissue microenvironment. Here, we survey the recent contributions of MEW in advancing musculoskeletal tissue engineering. More specifically, we briefly discuss the principles and technical aspects of MEW, provide an overview of current printers on the market, review in-depth the latest biomedical applications in musculoskeletal tissue regeneration, and, lastly, examine the limitations of MEW and offer future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.