ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Squid Skin Decellularised Dermal Matrix for Enhancing Repair of Acute Cranial Injuries in Rabbit Model.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of an In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Micro-Organoid Model Using Decellularized Squid Mantle Scaffold Film.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Squid skin decellularized dermal matrix (SADM) is gaining attention in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to its mimicking of the extracellular matrix property. Hence, SADM was used to investigate mimicking the microenvironment of cellular growth, inducing cellular infiltration and angiogenesis, and facilitating the repair of acute craniofacial wounds. For this, tissue regeneration membranes from squid skin were prepared by decolorization, degreasing and decellularisation methods. The effect of SADM in guiding bone tissue regeneration was evaluated using the rabbit skull bone defect model. SEM images of SADM had a bilayer membrane architecture characterized by a reticulated porous structure on one side and a dense, non-porous surface on the opposite side. Notably, the water absorption capacity of SADM was approximately eight times higher than its weight, exhibiting a porosity of 58% and a peak average tensile stress of 10.43 MPa. Additionally, simulations of tissue fluid degradation indicated a degradation rate of 70.42% and 88.33% on days 8 and 12, respectively. Following 4 and 8 weeks of animal studies focused on repairing cranial bone defects in rabbits, the findings demonstrated that SADM served as an effective barrier against fibrous connective tissue, promoted the proliferation of osteoblasts, and supported bone regeneration. This was confirmed through micro-CT imaging, and sections were stained with senna solid green. In summary, SADM is capable of directing cell infiltration and bone tissue formation, modulating the expression and secretion of inflammatory and skin repair-related factors, thereby enhancing tissue healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.