ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidosis and Its Underlying Mechanisms: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, Diagnostics and Therapy of Vulvovaginal Fungal Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine in the Topical Management of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: An Overview of In Vivo Data.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Contribution of fungal diseases to the U.S. chronic disease burden.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Evaluating Heat Shock Proteins as Biomarkers for Vaginal Fungal Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of TLR4 Polymorphisms with Increased Susceptibility to Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Greek Women.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Beyond antifungals: vaginal ceramides as a barrier-restorative strategy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC), defined as three or more episodes of vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) within a 12-month period, is a common and debilitating condition that affects a significant percentage of reproductive-aged women, negatively impacting their quality of life. This review aimed to synthesize the most recent scientific data on the pathophysiological mechanisms triggering primary or idiopathic RVVC. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Twelve studies were included, covering prospective cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies conducted in different countries. The results indicate that recurrence may be related to both intrinsic characteristics of the pathogen, such as increased virulence attributes of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.