ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Drug Sensitivity Testing in Osteosarcoma: A Case Report.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision medicine approaches using ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing (DST) have received attention in the cancer research community as a means to improve treatment stratification in populations where multiple treatment attempts are not feasible, or no standard-of-care treatment exists, such as ultra-rare cancers with a significant clinical need for effective treatment options, like osteosarcoma. DST has the potential to supplement existing patient stratification approaches by providing tumor-specific response data to aid in treatment selection at the time of treatment decision. We present the case of a pediatric osteosarcoma patient who was evaluated using DST at the time of standard-of-care treatment to evaluate treatment sensitivity. The DST screen indicated significant treatment sensitivity to anthracyclines and methotrexate, consistent with the first-line standard-of-care therapy (MAP). Clinical follow-up showed treatment sensitivity to standard-of-care MAP treatment and pathology results of 90% necrosis. The present case shows that DST screening is feasible from a technical standpoint, can be performed in a clinically relevant time frame that does not delay treatment start, and provides personalized drug sensitivity information on clinically available agents, and the DST results align with the clinical treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.