Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422460›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Quantitative Assessment of the Trigger Effect of Proton Flux on Seismicity.

Alexey Lyubushin, Eugeny Rodionov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexey LyubushinInstitute of Physics of the Earth RAS, Moscow 123242, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-415X
Eugeny RodionovInstitute of Physics of the Earth RAS, Moscow 123242, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimate of the trigger effect of the proton flux on seismicity was obtained. The proton flux time series with a time step of 5 min, 2000-2024, was analyzed. In each time interval of 5 days, statistics of the proton flux time series were calculated: mean values, logarithm of kurtosis, spectral slope, singularities spectrum support width, wavelet-based entropy, and the Donoho-Johnston wavelet-based index. For each of the used statistics, time points of local extrema were found, and for each pair of time sequences of proton flux statistics and earthquakes with a magnitude of at least 6.5 in sliding time windows, the "advance measures" of each time sequence relative to the other were estimated using a model of the intensity of interacting point processes. The difference between the "direct" measure of the advance of time points of local extrema of proton flux statistics relative to the time moments of earthquakes and the "inverse" measure of the advance was calculated. The maximum proportion of the intensity of seismic events for which the proton flux was a trigger was estimated as 0.28 for using the points of the local minima of the singularities spectrum support width.

Indexed as

earthquakesentropykurtosismultifractalspoint processesproton fluxspectral slopewavelets

Identifiers

PMID40422460
PMCPMC12110236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.