ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025
Telerehabilitation as an innovative strategy for the management of anxiety and dyspnea in post-COVID-19: A scoping review.
Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment and management of post-COVID-19 pulmonary complications: a rapid review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Telerehabilitation as an innovative strategy for the management of anxiety and dyspnea in post-COVID-19: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic brought challenges for everyone, especially for patients with persistent sequelae, driving interest in telerehabilitation as an alternative treatment. Additional evidence may be useful to better assess its efficacy and applicability in managing post-COVID-19 symptoms. This study aimed to enhance the understanding of telerehabilitation in the post-COVID-19 context, facilitating its integration into clinical settings and patient management. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, we reviewed PubMed, Excerpta Medica, and Scopus databases until January 2024. The study included primary and secondary research evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of telerehabilitation for patients with persistent COVID sequelae. This review analyzed 19 studies on telerehabilitation for long-term COVID-19 patients. Key findings included the comparison between hospital-based and telerehabilitation and synchronous versus asynchronous telerehabilitation. The main sequelae addressed were dyspnea, quality of life, and anxiety. Limitations, particularly regarding costs, were also examined. Telerehabilitation provides psychological and social support, which is essential for managing post-COVID-19. Despite initial costs, long-term benefits include reduced anxiety and improved quality of life. More long-term research is needed to better understand the limitations and potential implications of telerehabilitation for integration into post-COVID-19 care to optimize outcomes and provide continuous support to patients and caregivers during recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.