ArticleCells2025
Influence of Unidirectional Vacuum Application on Bone Healing in Maxillofacial Surgery.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a well known tissue defect bridging method that applies a vacuum pump to sterile, open-cell foam dressings via suction tubes. Although it has mostly been described for soft tissue use, there are also a few studies concerning its use on hard tissue. However, as oral and maxillofacial surgery has to deal with both soft and hard tissue, which lie next to each other in these regions, there is a particular need to assess the influence of negative pressure on bone. Therefore, the effects of different negative pressure levels (530 mbar and 725 mbar) and atmospheric pressure (1013 mbar) on bone tissue cultures and osteoblast cell cultures were investigated over periods of 1, 3, and 6 weeks. During the culture period, osteoblast growth and the tissue regeneration of bone defects were studied in vitro using tissue cultures that were histologically supplemented by cytological investigations and quantitative RNA expression studies. In the bone defect model, there was a faster defect reduction using NPWT; the effect was especially strong for 530 mbar. Compared to the control group, up to 30% more newly generated bone tissue was detected. This effect on the mineralization capacity was assessed by the mRNA expression of osteogenic marker genes, as well as the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two multifaceted cytokines that regulate bone metabolism. The influence of negative pressure consequently resulted in a decreased RANKL/OPG ratio in osteoblasts. Associated with the upregulation of marker genes to up to 400%, including Col1, BMP4, OCN, and RUNX2, the decrease in the RANKL/OPG ratio to 41% indicates the stimulation of osteogenesis. Since VAC has been shown to be a safe and effective method to close wounds in general, these data suggest that patients suffering from compound bone and soft tissue defects in the maxillofacial area may benefit from an adapted therapy approach accelerating both soft and hard tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.