ArticleCells2025
Validation of Clinical-Grade Electroporation Systems for CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Therapy in Primary Hepatocytes for the Correction of Inherited Metabolic Liver Disease.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Next-Gen Cell Therapy for Pediatric Patients: Neonatal Hepatocytes Tolerate Electroporation-Mediated Gene Editing and Engraft in the Liver.The CRISPR journal · 2026Article
- Versatile electroporation protocols enable reproducible CRISPR-RNP delivery across multiple primary mouse cells of the hematopoietic lineage.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Between defence and delivery: the DNA sensing response to gene electrotransfer.Radiology and oncology · 2025Review
- One Shock, Not One Cure: Electroporation Reveals Disease-Specific Constraints in Hepatocyte Gene Editing Therapy.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocyte transplantation (HTx) combined with ex vivo gene therapy has garnered significant interest due to its potential for treating many inherited metabolic liver diseases. The biggest obstacle for HTx is achieving sufficient engraftment levels to rescue diseased phenotypes, which becomes more challenging when combined with ex vivo gene editing techniques. However, recent technological advancements have improved electroporation delivery efficiency, cell viability, and scalability for cell therapy. We recently demonstrated the impacts of electroporation for cell-based gene therapy in a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT1). Here, we explore the use of the clinical-grade electroporator, the MaxCyte ExPERT GTx, utilized in the first FDA-approved CRISPR therapy, Casgevy, and evaluate its potential in primary hepatocytes in terms of delivery efficiency and cell viability. We assessed the gene editing efficiency and post-transplantation engraftment of hepatocytes from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.