Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422195›Full record

ArticleCells2025

Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of CHO 4BGD Cells with Quad Knockout and Overexpression of Two Housekeeping Genes That Allow for Metabolic Selection and Extended Fed-Batch Culturing.

Nadezhda Alexandrovna Orlova, Maria Valerievna Sinegubova, Denis Eduardovich Kolesov, Yulia Alexandrovna Khodak, Victor Vyacheslavovich Tatarskiy, Ivan Ivanovich Vorobiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Generation of Long-Lived CHO Cells Suitable for Production of Afucosylated Antibodies and Fc-Fusion Proteins.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadezhda Alexandrovna OrlovaLaboratory of Mammalian Cell Bioengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Federal State Institution Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology", Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-2892
Maria Valerievna SinegubovaLaboratory of Mammalian Cell Bioengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Federal State Institution Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology", Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-6061
Denis Eduardovich KolesovLaboratory of Mammalian Cell Bioengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Federal State Institution Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology", Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9230-3433
Yulia Alexandrovna KhodakLaboratory of Mammalian Cell Bioengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Federal State Institution Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology", Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-5344
Victor Vyacheslavovich TatarskiyLaboratory of Molecular Oncobiology, Institute of Gene Biology, 34/5 Vavilova Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-5683
Ivan Ivanovich VorobievLaboratory of Mammalian Cell Bioengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Federal State Institution Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology", Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0064-4458

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 25-24-00140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Re-engineering of CHO cells using genome editing and the overexpression of multiple helper genes is the central track for obtaining better cell lines for the production of biopharmaceuticals. Using two subsequent rounds of genome editing of the CHO S cells, we have developed the cell line CHO 4BGD with four knockouts of two pro-apoptotic genes bak1 and bax, and two common selection markers genes-glul (GS) and dhfr, and additional copies of genes bcl-2 and beclin-1 used for enhancement of macroautophagy. The NGS sequencing of 4BGD cells revealed that all eight targeted alleles were successfully disrupted. Two edited loci out of eight contained large inserts of non-relevant DNA. Further data analysis shows that cells have no off-target DNA editing events, and all known CHO genes are preserved. The cells obtained are completely resistant to the induction of apoptosis, and they are suitable for the generation of stably transfected cell lines with the dhfr selection marker. They also properly undergo the target gene amplification. The 4BGD-derived clonal cell line that secretes the monoclonal antibody retains the ability for prolonged fed-batch culturing. The method of obtaining multiply edited CHO cells using the multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 editing and simultaneous stable transfection of plasmids, coding for the housekeeping genes, is suitable for the rapid generation of massively edited CHO cells.

Indexed as

Batch Cell Culture TechniquesGene Knockout TechniquesGenes, EssentialGenomicsAnimalsApoptosisCHO CellsCricetulusCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPhenotypeapoptosisautophagybak1baxbcl-2beclin-1CHOCRISPR/Casdhfrgenome editingmammalian cell bioengineering

Identifiers

PMID40422195
PMCPMC12110749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.