ArticleCells2025
Immunoproteasome Inhibition Impairs Differentiation but Not Survival of T Helper 17 Cells.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The immunoproteasome as a neuroimmune hub in the central nervous system: from proteostasis stress to inflammatory pathology.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Immunoproteasome inhibition triggers protein stress and apoptosis in cells of B cell lineage without impairing vaccination-induced antibody responses.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Review
- Proteasome: Role in T Cell Function Regulation.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases are characterized by aberrant immune responses. The immunoproteasome was proposed as a target for such Th cell-mediated diseases due to its role in the activation, differentiation and function of T cells. Even though many studies demonstrated reductions in Th17 cells upon immunoproteasome inhibition, it is still unclear if the differentiation or survival of these cells is affected. Therefore, this study used DSS-induced colitis and house dust mite airway inflammation mouse models to investigate the effect of immunoproteasome inhibition on Th17 cells and Tregs at different time points. Th17 cells were almost abolished when immunoproteasome inhibition was applied continuously in DSS-induced colitis. In contrast, immunoproteasome inhibition did not decrease levels of already differentiated Th17 cells and did not enhance Treg induction. Dendritic cells were barely affected by immunoproteasome inhibition. Moreover, immunoproteasome inhibition reduced T cell activation in vitro and in vivo, suggesting impaired activation as the underlying mechanism for reduced Th17 differentiation. In conclusion, immunoproteasome inhibition reduces Th17 differentiation by impairing the activation of naïve T cells, but it does not affect the survival of already-differentiated Th17 cells and Tregs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.