Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422147›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Nanotopographical Features of Polymeric Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Review.

Kannan Badri Narayanan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kannan Badri NarayananSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-5556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotopography refers to the intricate surface characteristics of materials at the sub-micron (<1000 nm) and nanometer (<100 nm) scales. These topographical surface features significantly influence the physical, chemical, and biological properties of biomaterials, affecting their interactions with cells and surrounding tissues. The development of nanostructured surfaces of polymeric nanocomposites has garnered increasing attention in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to their ability to modulate cellular responses and enhance tissue regeneration. Various top-down and bottom-up techniques, including nanolithography, etching, deposition, laser ablation, template-assisted synthesis, and nanografting techniques, are employed to create structured surfaces on biomaterials. Additionally, nanotopographies can be fabricated using polymeric nanocomposites, with or without the integration of organic and inorganic nanomaterials, through advanced methods such as using electrospinning, layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly, sol-gel processing, in situ polymerization, 3D printing, template-assisted methods, and spin coating. The surface topography of polymeric nanocomposite scaffolds can be tailored through the incorporation of organic nanomaterials (e.g., chitosan, dextran, alginate, collagen, polydopamine, cellulose, polypyrrole) and inorganic nanomaterials (e.g., silver, gold, titania, silica, zirconia, iron oxide). The choice of fabrication technique depends on the desired surface features, material properties, and specific biomedical applications. Nanotopographical modifications on biomaterials' surface play a crucial role in regulating cell behavior, including adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and migration, which are critical for tissue engineering and repair. For effective tissue regeneration, it is imperative that scaffolds closely mimic the native extracellular matrix (ECM), providing a mechanical framework and topographical cues that replicate matrix elasticity and nanoscale surface features. This ECM biomimicry is vital for responding to biochemical signaling cues, orchestrating cellular functions, metabolic processes, and subsequent tissue organization. The integration of nanotopography within scaffold matrices has emerged as a pivotal regulator in the development of next-generation biomaterials designed to regulate cellular responses for enhanced tissue repair and organization. Additionally, these scaffolds with specific surface topographies, such as grooves (linear channels that guide cell alignment), pillars (protrusions), holes/pits/dots (depressions), fibrous structures (mimicking ECM fibers), and tubular arrays (array of tubular structures), are crucial for regulating cell behavior and promoting tissue repair. This review presents recent advances in the fabrication methodologies used to engineer nanotopographical microenvironments in polymeric nanocomposite tissue scaffolds through the incorporation of nanomaterials and biomolecular functionalization. Furthermore, it discusses how these modifications influence cellular interactions and tissue regeneration. Finally, the review highlights the challenges and future perspectives in nanomaterial-mediated fabrication of nanotopographical polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

biomaterialsnanocompositesnanomaterialsnanotopographynatural/synthetic scaffoldspolymerstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40422147
PMCPMC12109318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.