Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422132›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comprehensive Adaptive Enterprise Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications.

Shuxin Wang, Yejun Zheng, Li Cao, Mengji Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel Adaptive Superb Fairy-Wren (Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuxin WangSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shanghai Zhongqiao Vocational and Technical University, Shanghai 201514, China.
Yejun ZhengEngineering Technology Department, Shanghai Caoyang Vocational School, Wenzhou 200065, China.
Li CaoSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing and Electronic Engineering, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Mengji XiongSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shanghai Zhongqiao Vocational and Technical University, Shanghai 201514, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a brand-new algorithm called the Comprehensive Adaptive Enterprise Development Optimizer (CAED) is proposed to overcome the drawbacks of the Enterprise Development (ED) algorithm in complex optimization tasks. In particular, it aims to tackle the problems of slow convergence and low precision. To enhance the algorithm's ability to break free from local optima, a lens imaging reverse learning approach is incorporated. This approach creates reverse solutions by utilizing the concepts of optical imaging. As a result, it expands the search range and boosts the probability of finding superior solutions beyond local optima. Moreover, an environmental sensitivity-driven adaptive inertial weight approach is developed. This approach dynamically modifies the equilibrium between global exploration, which enables the algorithm to search for new promising areas in the solution space, and local development, which is centered on refining the solutions close to the currently best-found areas. To evaluate the efficacy of the CAED, 23 benchmark functions from CEC2005 are chosen for testing. The performance of the CAED is contrasted with that of nine other algorithms, such as the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), and the Antlion Optimizer (AOA). Experimental findings show that for unimodal functions, the standard deviation of the CAED is almost 0, which reflects its high accuracy and stability. In the case of multimodal functions, the optimal value obtained by the CAED is notably better than those of other algorithms, further emphasizing its outstanding performance. The CAED algorithm is also applied to engineering optimization challenges, like the design of cantilever beams and three-bar trusses. For the cantilever beam problem, the optimal solution achieved by the CAED is 13.3925, with a standard deviation of merely 0.0098. For the three-bar truss problem, the optimal solution is 259.805047, and the standard deviation is an extremely small 1.11 × 10

Indexed as

engineering applicationenterprise optimization algorithmlens imaging strategyreverse learning strategytent chaotic mapping

Identifiers

PMID40422132
PMCPMC12109219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.