ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Biomimetic Flapping Mechanism for Insect Robots Driven by Indirect Flight Muscles.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insect flight mechanisms are highly efficient and involve complex hinge structures that facilitate amplified wing movement through thoracic deformation. However, in the field of flapping-wing robots, the replication of thoracic skeletal structures has received little attention. In this study, we propose and compare two different hinge models inspired by insect flight: an elastic hinge model (EHM) and an axle hinge model (AHM). Both models were fabricated using 3D printing technology using PLA material. The EHM incorporates flexible structures in both the hinge and lateral scutum regions, allowing for deformation-driven wing motion. In contrast, the AHM employs metal pins in the hinge region to reproduce joint-like articulation, while still permitting elastic deformation in the lateral scutum. To evaluate their performance, we employed an SMA actuator to generate flapping motion, and measured the wing displacement, flapping frequency, and exoskeletal deformation. The experimental results demonstrate that the EHM achieves wing flapping through overall structural flexibility, whereas the AHM provides more defined hinge motion while maintaining exoskeletal elasticity. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of hinge mechanics in bioinspired flapping-wing robots. Future research will focus on optimizing these mechanisms for higher frequency operation, weight reduction, and better energy efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.