ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Class Imbalance in Facial Expression Recognition Using Dynamic Intra-Class Clustering.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While deep neural networks demonstrate robust performance in visual tasks, the long-tail distribution of real-world data leads to significant recognition accuracy degradation in critical scenarios such as medical human-robot affective interaction, particularly the misidentification of low-frequency negative emotions (e.g., fear and disgust) that may trigger psychological resistance in patients. Here, we propose a method based on dynamic intra-class clustering (DICC) to optimize the class imbalance problem in facial expression recognition tasks. The DICC method dynamically adjusts the distribution of majority classes by clustering them into subclasses and generating pseudo-labels, which helps the model learn more discriminative features and improve classification accuracy. By comparing with existing methods, we demonstrate that the DICC method can help the model achieve superior performance across various facial expression datasets. In this study, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of the DICC method against baseline methods using the FER2013, MMAFEDB, and Emotion-Domestic datasets, achieving improvements in classification accuracy of 1.73%, 1.97%, and 5.48%, respectively. This indicates that the DICC method can effectively enhance classification precision, especially in the recognition of minority class samples. This approach provides a novel perspective for addressing the class imbalance challenge in facial expression recognition and offers a reference for future research and applications in related fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.