ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Narrative Review and Clinical Study on Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Ceramic and Composite Veneers.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of high-power laser use in the removal of esthetic restorations: a systematic review.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Narrative Review of Lithium Disilicate Veneers in Esthetic Dentistry: Current Perspectives and Clinical Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Role of lasers in restorative dentistry: a review and update.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComposite resin veneers have gained popularity due to their affordability and minimally invasive application as biomimetic restorations. However, long-term clinical challenges, such as discoloration, wear, and reduced fracture resistance, necessitate their replacement over time. Ceramic veneers, particularly feldspathic and lithium disilicate, offer superior esthetics and durability, as demonstrated by studies showing their high survival rates and enamel-preserving preparation designs. However, while ceramic veneers survive longer than composite resin veneers, ceramic veneers may need to be removed and replaced. Reports vary for using Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) lasers for the removal of existing veneers.
methodsA review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of removing restorative materials with an Er:YAG laser. A clinical study was included, highlighting the conservative removal of aged composite resin veneers using the Er:YAG laser. This method minimizes enamel damage and facilitates efficient debonding. Following laser application, minimally invasive tooth preparation was performed, and feldspathic porcelain veneers were bonded.
resultsThe review showed positive outcomes whenever the Er:YAG laser was used. In the case study, after a 3-year follow-up, the restorations exhibited optimal function and esthetics.
conclusionsLaser-assisted debonding provides a safe and predictable method for replacing failing composite veneers with ceramic alternatives, aligning with contemporary biomimetic principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.