ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Bio-Inspired Learning Dendritic Motion Detection Framework with Direction-Selective Horizontal Cells.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motion direction detection is an essential task for both computer vision and neuroscience. Inspired by the biological theory of the human visual system, we proposed a learnable horizontal-cell-based dendritic neuron model (HCdM) that captures motion direction with high efficiency while remaining highly robust. Unlike present deep learning models, which rely on extension of computation and extraction of global features, the HCdM mimics the localized processing of dendritic neurons, enabling efficient motion feature integration. Through synaptic learning that prunes unnecessary parts, our model maintains high accuracy in noised images, particularly against salt-and-pepper noise. Experimental results show that the HCdM reached over 99.5% test accuracy, maintained robust performance under 10% salt-and-pepper noise, and achieved cross-dataset generalization exceeding 80% in certain conditions. Comparisons with state-of-the-art (SOTA) models like vision transformers (ViTs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrate the HCdM's robustness and efficiency. Additionally, in contrast to previous artificial visual systems (AVSs), our findings suggest that lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) structures, though present in biological vision, may not be essential for motion direction detection. This insight provides a new direction for bio-inspired computational models. Future research will focus on hybridizing the HCdM with SOTA models that perform well on complex visual scenes to enhance its adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.