ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bio-Inspired Swarm Confrontation Algorithm for Complex Hilly Terrains.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores a bio-inspired swarm confrontation algorithm specifically designed for complex hilly terrains in the context of electronic games. The novelty of the proposed algorithm lies in its utilization of biologically inspired strategies to facilitate adaptive and efficient decision-making in dynamic environments. Drawing from the collective hunting behaviors of various animal species, this paper distills two key confrontation strategies: focused fire for target selection and flanking encirclement for movement coordination and attack execution. These strategies are embedded into a decentralized swarm decision-making framework, enabling agents to exhibit enhanced responsiveness and coordination in complex gaming landscapes. To validate its effectiveness, extensive experiments were conducted, comparing the proposed approach against three established algorithms. The results demonstrate that this method achieves a confrontation win rate exceeding 80%, outperforming existing techniques in both engagement efficiency and survivability. Additionally, two novel performance indices, namely the average agent quantity loss rate and the average health loss rate, are introduced to provide a more comprehensive assessment of algorithmic effectiveness. Furthermore, the impact of key algorithmic parameters on performance indices is analyzed, offering insights into the adaptability and robustness of the proposed algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.