ArticleThe oncologist2025
Optimization of multiprofessional care for young colorectal cancer patients: a qualitative Study.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in patients ≤50 (early-onset-CRC, EOCRC) years is increasing. Given their different phase of life, younger individuals may face specific challenges in terms of body image, professional life, and psychosocial support. However, tailored programs for EOCRC patients are lacking in Germany. JUMP-START, a prospective study at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg in collaboration with the AIO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft internistische Onkologie) and the foundation for young adults with cancer in Germany aims to identify the specific needs of EOCRC patients and improve multiprofessional care. MATERIALS AND
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted until content saturation, based on an interview guide focused on challenges related to diagnosis, utilization of support programs, and unmet needs. The interview guide was developed in an expert and patient panelist discussion. Qualitative analysis was performed with MAXQDA, using a content structuring qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
resultsForty-three EOCRC patients were screened, and 14 participants were interviewed at NCT Heidelberg between October 2023 and January 2024. Three main themes emerged: (1) The impact of CRC diagnosis at an early age on psychological and physical health, daily routine, and future perspectives, (2) Experiences with care service access and utility, and (3) Expectations for a multiprofessional care at a dedicated EOCRC center.
conclusionsEOCRC patients highlighted various age-group-specific challenges related to diagnosis and treatment. Tailored multiprofessional programs may optimize care for EOCRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.