ArticleThe oncologist2025
Biweekly dosing of trifluridine-tipiracil reduces rates of myelosuppression while maintaining efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Real-world outcomes and prognostic factors of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study in Spain.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- New dosing schedules in pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The risk factors for chemotherapy myelosuppression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Receiving Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Real-World UK Retrospective Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTrifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for refractory unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The recommended dose is 35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of 28-day cycles commonly resulting in grade 3-4 neutropenia, dose delays/reductions, and requiring GCSF support. To maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity, we analyzed a biweekly dosing schedule (days 1-5 and days 15-19 q28 days). PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed in patients with mCRC and appendiceal cancer who completed >12 days of TAS-102 therapy and underwent surveillance imaging every 8-12 weeks. ECOG performance status (PS), prior lines of therapy, use of bevacizumab, CTCAE grade of treatment-related myelotoxicity, dose reductions/delays, and use of GCSF were assessed. Among patients with mCRC, survival analyses were performed.
results61 patients met inclusion criteria, with mCRC:appendiceal CA ratio of 56:5. Median ECOG PS = 1; median number of prior therapies = 3; Reduction in grade ≥3 neutropenia (16.3%, 1 patient with grade 4) and grade ≥3 anemia (8.2%) relative to the historic controls of the RECOURSE and SUNLIGHT trials. No neutropenic fever was noted; GCSF was not required. Eight patients required a dose delay. In the mCRC patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 9.2 months.
conclusionsBiweekly dosing of TAS-102 demonstrated a reduction in myelosuppression, with similar PFS and OS. With an improved toxicity profile, this alternative dosing schedule may potentially broaden the utilization of TAS-102 in patients with borderline PS and provide a favorable option for future combination studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.