Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421866›Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2025

AI in Neurology: Everything, Everywhere, all at Once PART 2: Speech, Sentience, Scruples, and Service.

Matthew Rizzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Status epilepticus: the score question.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew RizzoDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
PREDICTIONS OF DRIVER SAFETY IN ADVANCING AGER01AG017177 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 1999 to 2024
$9.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017177NIA NIH HHS R01AG017177NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM115458University of Nebraska Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are finding use in real-world neurological settings. Whereas part 1 of this 3-part review series focused on the birth of AI and its foundational principles, this part 2 review shifts gears to explore more practical aspects of neurological care. The review details how large language models, generative AI, and robotics are supporting diagnostic accuracy, patient interaction, and treatment personalization. Special attention is given to ethical and philosophical facets of AI that nonetheless impact practical aspects of care and patient safety, such as accountability for AI-driven decisions and the "black box" nature of many algorithms. We will discuss whether AI systems can develop sentience, and the implications for human-AI collaboration. By examining human-robot interactions in neurology, this part 2 review highlights the profound impact AI could have on patient care and, as covered in the ensuing part 3, on global health care delivery and data analytics, while maintaining ethical oversight and human control. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:431-447.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeurologyDelivery of Health CareHumansRobotics

Identifiers

PMID40421866
PMCPMC12392058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.