ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Development of an Open-Source Algorithm for Automated Segmentation in Clinician-Led Paranasal Sinus Radiologic Research.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician-Guided Deep Learning Segmentation of Skull Base Pneumatization on Computed Tomography Using 3D Slicer and MONAI Label.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of an Open-Source Algorithm for Automated Segmentation in Clinician-Led Paranasal Sinus Radiologic Research.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveArtificial Intelligence (AI) research needs to be clinician led; however, expertise typically lies outside their skill set. Collaborations exist but are often commercially driven. Free and open-source computational algorithms and software expertise are required for meaningful clinically driven AI medical research. Deep learning algorithms automate segmenting regions of interest for analysis and clinical translation. Numerous studies have automatically segmented paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans; however, openly accessible algorithms capturing the sinonasal cavity remain scarce. The purpose of this study was to validate and provide an open-source segmentation algorithm for paranasal sinus CTs for the otolaryngology research community.
methodsA cross-sectional comparative study was conducted with a deep learning algorithm, UNet++, modified for automatic segmentation of paranasal sinuses CTs and "ground-truth" manual segmentations. A dataset of 100 paranasal sinuses scans was manually segmented, with an 80/20 training/testing split. The algorithm is available at https://github.com/rheadkaul/SinusSegment. Primary outcomes included the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score, Intersection over Union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD), sensitivity, specificity, and visual similarity grading.
resultsTwenty scans representing 7300 slices were assessed. The mean DSC was 0.87 and IoU 0.80, with HD 33.61 mm. The mean sensitivity was 83.98% and specificity 99.81%. The median visual similarity grading score was 3 (good). There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes with normal or diseased paranasal sinus CTs.
conclusionAutomatic segmentation of CT paranasal sinuses yields good results when compared with manual segmentation. This study provides an open-source segmentation algorithm as a foundation and gateway for more complex AI-based analysis of large datasets. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.