ReviewCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2025
The future of target-controlled infusion and new pharmacokinetic models.
Review in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07586189 (Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider Target-Controlled Infusion Models. A Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider Target-Controlled Infusion Models. A Randomized Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo summarize recent developments in the understanding of the pharmacology of the hypnotic and opioid drugs, with relevance to target-controlled infusions and newer pharmacokinetic models. RECENT
findingsGeneral-purpose models have been developed for propofol, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine, suitable for use in a wide variety of patients, but still not universally applicable. A validation study of the predictive performance of the Eleveld propofol model showed reasonable performance in children, healthy adults, and obese adults but poorer performance in elderly patients. Observational studies show that complications during total intravenous anesthesia often arise from omission of basic safety checks and inadequate knowledge, rather than model misspecification. Specifically, there is a lack of understanding of the influence of the clinical situation on the pharmacodynamics of hypnotic drugs. Artificial intelligence is likely to produce useful drug infusion rate advisory systems, or even closed-loop control systems that could potentially provide better patient-individualized titration of anesthetic drugs. SUMMARY: Further efforts to develop new models are unlikely to be clinically beneficial. Efforts should rather be made to ensure better education and a better appreciation of variability in pharmacodynamics and the need for better ways of tailoring drug doses to individual patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.