Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Research on soil bacterial community assembly and function under different straw returning practices in arid and semi-arid agricultural ecosystems over multiple years.

Rui-Zhi Liu, Xiao-Ya Zhao, Biao Feng, Wen-Shan Zhao, Ming-Yu Li, Xiao-Fang Yu, Shu-Ping Hu, Rui-Ping Li, Ju-Lin Gao, Qinggeer Borjigin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rui-Zhi LiuCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiao-Ya ZhaoCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Biao FengCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Wen-Shan ZhaoCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Ming-Yu LiCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiao-Fang YuCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Shu-Ping HuKey Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, China.
Rui-Ping LiCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Ju-Lin GaoCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Qinggeer BorjiginCollege of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Straw return has gained attention for its potential to improve soil quality and crop yields, particularly in semi-arid regions like the Tumu Chuan Plain Irrigation Area. Soil bacteria play a crucial role in regulating soil biological processes, and understanding how straw return affects bacterial populations can guide better agricultural management practices. Methods: We investigated the impact of continuous straw return on soil bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Four treatments were applied: Farmers' shallow rotation (CK), straw incorporated with deep tillage (DPR), straw incorporated with subsoiling (SSR), and no-tillage mulching straw return (NTR). Bacterial community structure, metabolic pathways, and assembly mechanisms were analyzed using Bugbase and PICRUSt2 for phenotypic and metabolic pathway predictions. Results: The study found that straw return practices significantly altered the relative abundance and life history strategies of bacterial phyla, mainly influenced by soil organic matter (SOM) and enzyme activity. The K-strategist to r-strategist ratio was highest in CK (2.06) and lowest in SSR (1.89). DPR and NTR treatments significantly changed bacterial community structure compared to CK ( Discussion: The study demonstrates that continuous straw return practices significantly impact soil bacterial communities. DPR and NTR notably improved microbial diversity, bacterial cooperation, and ecosystem stability. These findings provide valuable insights for sustainable agricultural practices in semi-arid regions, enhancing soil microbial ecology and soil health through strategic straw return.

Indexed as

bacterial lifestyleecosystem stabilitysemi-arid agriculturesoil microbial community assemblystraw return practices

Identifiers

PMID40421462
PMCPMC12104234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.