ReviewBJA open2025
Evaluating the risks and benefits of continuing
Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of continuing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors before surgery on intraoperative hypotensive events: a secondary analysis of the STOP-or-NOT Trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Trial
- Stopping versus continuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors before surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The best perioperative management of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has been an ongoing debate as a result of inconclusive previous studies and insufficient data for robust guidelines. Although continuation of RASi may lead to intraoperative hypotension, withholding might also cause postoperative complications. Our meta-analysis aims to explore the postoperative outcomes of strategies of RASi management before surgery by evaluating randomised clinical trials, to provide more definitive conclusions for clinical practice. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science until September 2024. Inclusion criteria included patients (≥18 yr) who underwent noncardiac surgery and received long-term RASi, which were either withheld or continued before surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted using R Studio version 4.4.2. Results: A total of seven RCTs with 8741 patients receiving long-term RASi before noncardiac surgery revealed no significant difference between continuation and withholding groups regarding cardiovascular complications (risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.09, Conclusions: Continuing RASi before noncardiac surgery does not significantly impact mortality, cardiovascular complications or the risk of acute kidney injury. However, continuation is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative hypotension, and withholding with a higher risk of postoperative severe hypertension. Systematic review protocol: CRD42024605208 (PROSPERO).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.